Catholic during the Great Apostasy

We were born to win, yet we live constantly losing.

Is the system afraid of us?

Yes — it is afraid of our potential hidden in our souls. Our strength lies in what has been passed on to us and what the world wants to erase from our memory at all costs.

From the very beginning God has given us one piece of information that always leads to our downfall. He tells us: do not act this way, do not trust your lusts and the whispers of other people. Yet we always listen to the world and fly like moths to the light that lures us only so that we may die. We are suicides.

An interesting thing is that only in Paradise did Adam and Eve not know what consequences their decisions would have. That is — they knew what God told them, but they did not know the effects of their actions; they could not learn from their own mistakes. Every subsequent generation already had more and more examples of the disastrous consequences of human actions.

Did that change anything in how people behave?

Of course not. We always choose evil. It looks as if we are walking on magnificent, expensive carpets straight toward our coronation, but somewhere along the way, in a side aisle, we notice some desire of ours — maybe bodily, maybe spiritual — some unknown lust that attracts us, tempts us, until finally we cannot resist and, like Lot’s wife, we turn around. We become an ordinary stone; the former pearl is thrown to the swine to be trampled.

We reject the crown, we reject the words: “I have overcome the world.”

This is our eternal error of pride and desire.

Our desires lead us to a situation in which we do not want to bear the consequences of our actions. In a mechanical way we try to stop them so that we can satisfy our human whims.

The Romans (especially the elites) used emetics — substances that induce vomiting. Most often these were: – drinks with added herbs (e.g., hellebore), – strongly salted or bitter mixtures, – sometimes mechanical provocation of vomiting.

The goal was simple: empty the stomach and continue the feast.

Previously there was a scheme: act – consequence – reflection – correction of behavior.

Here it becomes: act – technical nullification of the consequence – repetition of the act.

Simple patterns of our behavior are visible not only in excess in eating and drinking. In this case we destroy only our bodies — we are suicides, because we act directly to our own harm.

However, a human trait is the expansion of the scope of harm of one’s actions, which has led to the acceptance, and even promotion, of the murder of unborn children as an act supposedly connected with freedom. The same scheme has been applied:

act – nullification of consequences through abortion, abortion pills, and similar methods of killing – repetition of the act.

Our excess food and human life end up in the sewers. And this is acceptable to man. This clearly testifies not only to his moral downfall, but also to the fact that evolutionists are wrong. It is not possible, and probably has never happened in the animal world, for any species to act as destructively and suicidally toward itself as humans are capable of doing.

We were born to win, but instead we act exactly opposite to what nature and common sense — and thus God — command us. We most easily reject what God conveys to us. It seems so simple to us, because it is enough to say: “this is some superstition, backwardness,” without scientific or even logical explanations, and immediately the world accepts us and places us on pedestals built of sand, not of rock.

Like beautiful butterflies we flutter in a sunny, green meadow, knowing that it is destined to become a landfill. We do nothing, we pretend it is a lie, until garbage trucks arrive, dumping tons of the world’s waste on us, burying our destiny — perhaps forever.

There is always a spark of hope, a spark of truth that can guide us.

There is only one problem: we are not blind and deaf because of an external disease that can be mechanically cured — perhaps with happiness pills, or with other human methods. We are consumed by an internal disease. We live in a lie. We dance while sinking in garbage, as if we were still in a beautiful meadow.

Beauty, like truth, is very simple. The beauty of the soul needs no retouching; truth likewise — it will defend itself. But simplicity is often white or black, and we do not like that. We look for something more, a palette of colors in between. It is not enough for us to know that the Temple has been destroyed — we look for sensations such as the idea that there are three popes and one of them is very hidden because he guards the greatest secrets. Interesting? Sensational?

For me, no — because it changes nothing, adds nothing new. What difference does it make whether we have one blasphemer or three? Now we have hundreds, even thousands among the clergy.

Why do I mention this? There is only one reason: lack of logic, which most likely means a lie. How do the authors of this theory know about it? From librarians and archivists. Right — the system hid the existence of the third pope so well that it forgot to hide his secrets. Useless knowledge. These are merely sensations that the system skillfully feeds us, in a dose that does not cause vomiting, allowing it to control our emotions and desire for rebellion. This is only one example, but let us remember: if there is censorship — and a very harsh one — on the internet, how is it possible that such and similar sensations are spread without any problem?

I will refer to one more issue — the Epstein list, and not even to the list itself. It concerns the people involved. People in high positions, accustomed to omnipresent surveillance.

Why did they take photos with children and with themselves in such a place?

Were they and are they complete idiots?

I do not think so. And in fact it does not interest me, but we should ask ourselves such questions when reading such sensations with flushed faces. However, the question should be phrased differently:

Why did those photos change NOTHING in reality?

And that is all on this topic — let everyone try to answer this question for themselves.

A feature of almost all groups and sides writing about fighting the system is presenting religion as a tool for stupefying society — but always Christianity — while other religions are shown as tools of enlightenment: Eastern spirituality, etc.

This is action in line with the system. Otherwise they would never have existed on a broader scale, and certainly not in completely controlled social media.

Out of curiosity I will ask one more question: why is the Middle Ages portrayed as if people never washed? There was no water? They built magnificent castles and cathedrals, but could not wash themselves?

What our Lord Jesus Christ conveys to us is our spiritual liberation. The soul is what allows us to overcome the world that hates us. The pleasures and desires we live by are what destroy us — not because all of them are evil, but because they have taken control of our lives and we think of nothing else.

We cannot leave them, abandon everything and follow Christ, follow the voice of our soul. A soul that in fact tells us to think and to choose between good and evil. If you can mechanically stop the consequences of your actions, then it is no longer a choice, because in your view you have eliminated the threat and the given act becomes normal — neither good nor evil. This is an obvious deception of yourself, not of God, who sees our thoughts. You made the choice earlier, for example by assuming that you would buy pills and therefore commit an abortion.

Globally, the market related to abortion — including procedures and pharmacological abortion agents — is worth tens of billions of dollars annually.

If you think that only pharmaceutical companies make money from this, you are deeply mistaken. Post-abortion complications — physical or psychological — are also an excellent way to make money from human foolishness.

This is the case in many areas of medicine. Vaccines generate large sums of money, but treating complications after them — no less.

You are not a laboratory guinea pig. You are a piggy bank full of money that needs to be broken open and robbed down to the last penny. When nothing is left, euthanasia is offered — increasingly often without your consent, but for your convenience, because you do not have to suffer. In the past, someone who robbed you, injured you, and then killed you would have been the worst criminal. Now he is your savior.

Cruel? Maybe. But true.

One more example. A modest woman, caring about her reputation, wanting a family and children, is portrayed as a victim of male chauvinism, treated as an object, a slave of superstition — of course Christian. Meanwhile, in Islam, where she cannot show even a piece of a finger, this is supposed to be a symbol of liberation. Yet a woman without modesty, changing partners like gloves, seems more like an object passed from hand to hand. Not to mention that in those other religions she would be stoned for such acts.

These are paradoxes instilled in people by the system, which, it seems to me, are worth reminding from time to time.

You should be a winner — that is why you were born — but you must accept yourself as you truly are. You should think and make independent choices. These are not difficult choices; you do not need super-intelligence. You need only a sober look at yourself and the reality around you. This will allow you to accept the crosses and adversities you encounter in life, and after some time — if you are not a believer — to regain faith, which is a natural human need. Many outstanding scientists, after years of research, became believers — and deeply so. Nothing prevents this from happening to you as well.

Scientists studied the laws of biology, physics, mathematics, and you must study the laws that govern this world and reject everything that is a lie. You must also delve into your soul, uncover what is hidden, ask questions, find answers, remembering that the very act of asking a question is often the answer.

No — do not start with questions like: does God exist, does the matrix exist.

Start with simple tasks, such as catching all the illogical elements in what is transmitted by omnipresent propaganda.

There is such a simple question: if healthcare has no money, why are patients who want to try alternative treatment threatened that they will no longer be able to use its services?

Such a patient should be patted on the back and even encouraged to take such actions, because more money remains in the system.

It is worth emphasizing once again that the system is not the main enemy — human escape from responsibility is.

Think — thinking does not hurt,
but thoughtlessness hurts a great deal.