Catholic during the Great Apostasy

I will try to break down their unrequited love into its components. However, I must point out that giving a rational explanation for the behavior of people deprived of basic logical thinking is impossible.

So let’s start with the similarities.

In classical Islamic theory, the world is divided into Dar al-Islam, meaning “the house of Islam” – Muslim territories – and Dar al-Harb, meaning “the house of war” – the rest of the world, with which jihad is waged until conquest. This is not a marginal issue but the foundation of historical Islam. That is why terrorists do not consider themselves “radicals” but faithful executors of sharia law.

Classical communist doctrine was also based on a similar division. There was the socialist camp – countries ruled by the communist party and subordinated to the ideology of Marxism-Leninism – and the capitalist camp, meaning the rest of the world treated as “class enemies,” with whom the fight had to be waged until the victory of the global revolution.

The basis of communism is not coexistence but permanent struggle: proletariat against bourgeoisie, poor against rich, revolution against “reaction.” Just as Islam prescribes jihad, communism prescribes revolution and violence against opponents. Communism also assumed the dictatorship of the proletariat. Just as sharia covers all aspects of life, communism sought total control of the party over the state, the economy, and private life. “There is nothing outside the party” – whoever opposes is an enemy of the people.

In Islam, apostasy means the death penalty. In communism, abandoning the ideology equaled “counterrevolution” and betrayal of the people – in practice this ended in gulags, prisons, or executions. Communism also assumed expansion and the export of revolution – just as Islam prescribes expanding the “house of Islam” to new countries.

Islam and communism have the same logic – a total ideology, division of the world into friend and enemy, terror against opponents, lack of freedom, and eternal expansion.

In Islam, imposed rules of dress apply, such as the hijab, burqa, or traditional male garments, while in communism uniformity was also promoted – uniforms and the lack of a “bourgeois” style. The goal was to homogenize society and erase individual differences. Both sharia and communism regulate all aspects of life – from law and politics to private life. Both ideologies, in historical practice, used terror against opponents. They also featured attractive slogans of equality – “social justice,” “equality of all before God” – but reality was full of inequality and brutality.

Leftists love Islam partly for the reasons listed above, but the most important reason is that their leaders – the globalist elite – command them to. They act instinctively like Pavlov’s dogs, but not quite, because those animals received a reward for such behavior, while leftists await death. Unless the healthy part of society stops this madness.

Here is how Islam, which they support, treats leftist ideologies: Homosexuality, called liwat – in some schools is obligatorily punished by death, usually by stoning. Some scholars allowed execution by throwing from a height, then finishing off with stones. The Hanafi school in some versions prescribed flogging (100 lashes) or imprisonment instead of death, but many Hanafis also allowed the death penalty.

Lesbianism, called sihaq, was usually punished by flogging – one hundred lashes, like adultery. Some scholars also prescribed longer imprisonment. Transgenderism and conscious sex change were treated as rebellion against God, and in classical sharia the death penalty threatened for it.

Propagating ideologies such as gender or LGBT, as well as undermining gender roles, was classified as fasad fil-ard – spreading corruption on earth. The death penalty threatened open proclamation and recruiting others. Flogging or imprisonment were applied for individual incidents, depending on the judge. Apostasy, meaning rejection of Islamic teaching, for example claiming that homosexuality is good, always ended in the death penalty in every classical school of law – usually by beheading with a sword. Execution followed after three calls to return to Islam.

One can see the lack of logic, and indeed of reason at all, as is typical of communism’s supporters. One should also remember that they claim to be atheists, while at the same time supporting the most fanatical religion in the world. A possible, though irrational, explanation is that they think like Freemasons – that they have discovered the secrets of the East, mysticism, and that this will allow them to control Islamic fanatics.

Freemasons, Templars, and Rosicrucians “borrowed” from Islam and Eastern mysticism religious and esoteric symbolism – geometric patterns, numbers, symbols. They also borrowed mysticism and meditation techniques, reinterpreted in an occult spirit, ideas of the unity of the universe, secret knowledge, and “divine harmony.” They also drew inspiration from elements of Islamic law and philosophy, adapting them for their own rituals.

For Muslims and Islamic fanatics, however, anything that modifies the Quran, hadith, or religious practices is treated as bid‘ah – heretical innovation. Occult mysticism, especially combined with non-Islamic elements, is heresy, sometimes even blasphemy. Islamic fanatics consider such “seekers of secrets” enemies of the faith, to be fought spiritually or physically.

The conclusion is simple: what Freemasons and similar organizations recognize as “secret knowledge,” in Islamic practice is completely rejected. There is no possibility of “combining” these worlds in the eyes of orthodox believers – for them it is not inspiration but heresy and danger.

Leftist behavior is so stupid that it borders on mental illness. I am not insulting the mentally ill here, because in their behavior I would find more rationality than in leftists, who so often speak of rationalism.

To sum up this short comparison, one can say that in the case of taking power Islam will first of all kill its leftist supporters, whom it now tolerates and treats as useful idiots.

It is such a destructive love – for the dagger held by the murderer.

A rhetorical question arises by itself, which explains most of the behavior of globalists, leftists, or communists – depending on what name we use for the same ideology:

What good is reason to a fool?

There is one more thing that points to their unity in dehumanization. A Man was killed – Charlie Kirk: a conservative, supporter of the traditional family, a Christian. I read his statement in which he said that evangelicals, Protestants venerate Mary too little. He was also a man who openly supported Israel’s recent actions. For his views, he was murdered – taken away from his own children.

I deliberately emphasize the word Man, because those who today celebrate his death – leftists and Islamists, dancing and calling for even greater terror – do not deserve the name of man. They do not even deserve the name of animal.

Start thinking at last. Thinking does not hurt. What hurts is the truth, which you reject thoughtlessly – and it hurts a lot.

Arkadiusz Niewolski