„Since we can encompass this entire system with one glance, no one will be surprised if we describe it as a fusion of heresies. We assure you that if someone wished to compile the content of all errors concerning faith, they could not do so more precisely than the modernists have done.”
(St. Pius X – Pascendi Dominici Gregis)
…
Unfortunately, sometimes one must confront the truth and facts, especially when it concerns our faith, which in Poland over the past decades has been degraded to the image of Karol Wojtyła liking cream puffs and smiling nicely. The reality is quite different, and criticism, which in our country meets with outrage and is labeled as national betrayal, has been very strong worldwide from the beginning of his pontificate and has always had rational foundations based on facts. The issue of sexual abuse is a matter crying out for vengeance to heaven, but I will not write about it here, as it is a characteristic of all so-called post-conciliar popes (referring to the Second Vatican Council). It always looked and looks the same: they condemned it with words but contradicted themselves with actions.When it comes to the famous aid in overthrowing communism, one thing needs to be clarified right away: it was merely a transfer of power to communists who had repainted themselves as democrats. Millions of Poles had to emigrate in search of work, the economy was destroyed and plundered, and this situation led to the breakdown of families. Meanwhile, Karol Wojtyła was hosting the beneficiaries of these changes—former communists and agents—in his salons, and of course, he did not respond to the suffering and poverty that engulfed post-communist countries; instead, he supported it all.
Ideological Formation of Karol Wojtyła
The first matter one must confront is the myth that he was a conservative safeguarding the deposit of faith, unaware of any errors because he was deceived and did not realize the consequences of his actions. If someone ran a company this way, they would either quickly lose their position or lead it to ruin, and in the case of a pope, the consequences are incomparably greater because we are talking about the Church and human souls. Of course, these are just clumsy attempts to uphold such an idealistic image, because Karol Wojtyła was, one could say, a staunch modernist. His teachings were the result of a fascination with heretical ideologies. So let us examine his ideological roots.
He was known for his engagement in a kind of theosophical philosophy of „know thyself” in the style of Rudolph Steiner – a liberal thinker who greatly influenced Angelo Roncalli (Pope John XXIII).
A significant influence on Karol Wojtyła was his mentor Kotlarczyk, a history teacher and theater director. Later, together with Wojtyła, he co-founded the experimental Rhapsodic Theater. It was Kotlarczyk who initiated Wojtyła into the field of phenomenology.
Interestingly, Kotlarczyk was fascinated by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (an occultist), the Russian founder of modern theosophy. Blavatsky, like Wojtyła, taught that religions are very similar to one another and all stem from the same original source.
He was fascinated by the philosophy of Rahner, Küng, and Dulles, as well as the existentialism of Maritain and von Balthasar – most of whom propagated heresies (e.g., by denying the divinity of Christ and transubstantiation).
During the Second Vatican Council, Archbishop Wojtyła commented on the Church’s missionary activity: „It is not the Church’s role to teach unbelievers. Let us seek together with our neighbors – let us avoid moralizing or suggesting that we have a monopoly on truth.” As Pope, he reiterated this in his encyclical Ut Unum Sint and often spoke of the possibility of universal salvation for all people. For example, in his encyclical Redemptoris Missio, he stated that „salvation is accessible in a mysterious way – even to those who are not members of the Church or have not accepted the Gospel – as long as God’s grace is granted to them through the grace of Christ.”
Together with other bishops, he removed from Gaudium et Spes (despite the opposition of the Czech Archbishop Hnilica) any condemnation of the horror of atheistic communism. For this, he was appointed a cardinal by Paul VI in 1967. It is now clear why there was no lustration or removal of communists from power in Poland, while the Czechs handled it quickly and decisively.
At the Synod in Rome in 1974, there was a call for an „evangelization of love,” and Cardinal Wojtyła served as the official theologian for the particularly progressive Cardinal Etchegaray of Marseille. His introductory lecture was inspired by Maritain’s Integral Humanism; later, he emphasized the ideas of the Austrian Jesuit Joseph Jungmann, who called for „abandoning the sterile transmission of dogmatic theological teaching.”
It should be added here that as early as 1953, he celebrated Mass facing the people. Clearly, he was well-informed by his modernist friends who, at that time, were still operating in secret, but the illness of Pius XII must have emboldened them. An interesting question is whether they also informed him that they were conducting talks with communist Russia behind Pius XII’s back?
Between 1973 and 1975, Cardinal Wojtyła was received eleven times in private audiences by Paul VI. This had never happened before with a foreign cardinal! This fact alone shows how highly Wojtyła was regarded among modernist deceivers.
This period is very thoroughly documented by Fr. Luigi Villa in his book (chronology, photos)
I present these matters only briefly, highlighting the most important points.
It is clear that modernism was well-known to Wojtyła from his early youth, and it did not bother him that popes called modernism the sewer of all heresies. Cardinal Wyszyński could not even leave his diocese, while Karol Wojtyła undertook an impressive number of foreign trips. The communist authorities liked him in their own way because he never openly criticized them. Even when his acquaintances were arrested. In November 1952, Archbishop Baziak was arrested, an event that deeply shocked the Catholic community in Kraków. Karol Wojtyła made no statement, neither private nor public. Two days after the arrest, he went skiing in the mountains. He remained silent even when his professor and longtime friend, Father Kurowski, was arrested. In his writings and sermons, Karol Wojtyła never openly attacked communism. (Marxism of John Paul II)
Thus, it is no surprise that when he was elected pope, all liberals and modernists were delighted. Some even claimed that it was Brzezinski, the chief ideologue of globalists striving to establish the reign of the Antichrist, who recognized his potential and contributed to his election as pope.
Pontificate of John Paul II
Let us start from the end. After the death of John Paul II, voices praising him emerged from almost every side. John Vennari described this very well in his text The Mystery of Pope John Paul II’s Success:
„Cardinals, bishops, priests, nuns, and laypeople competed with each other to canonize him as ‚John Paul the Great.’ Politicians and non-Catholic religious leaders praised him for his humanity and commitment to other religions. He was praised for his leadership, his popularity with youth, his travels, his poetry, his writing. He was praised for his pioneering style, being a man of the people, his ‚theology of the body,’ his media savvy, his evangelization, his charisma, his humor. Pop star Bono dubbed John Paul the ‚funky Pontiff.’ No one seemed to evaluate his papacy using the only measure that matters: the infallible and unchanging Catholic faith of all time. It was all sentiment, all emotion, all feelings.
The day John Paul II died, I received a call from a young lady from New Zealand, a family friend. She currently works with Muslims and Hindus. When she tells them they must convert to the one true Catholic Church to save their souls, the Muslims and Hindus laugh at her. ‚Your Pope doesn’t believe that,’ they chuckle, referring to John Paul II. ‚Your Pope doesn’t teach that. Your Pope’s interfaith actions don’t show that. Your Pope prays with the Dalai Lama and Hindus. Your Pope visits mosques and kisses the Koran. You’re out of step with your own Pope. Why should we listen to you?’
Two young Catholic acquaintances debating with Protestants were also mocked when they told a Protestant he must become Catholic to be saved. ‚What?’ said the Protestant. ‚Clearly, you don’t read your own Pope’s writings. He prays with Protestants. He praises Martin Luther as a man of ‘profound religiosity.’ He calls Protestants ‘disciples of Christ.’ He never says you have to become Catholic for salvation.’
Brother Roger of the ecumenical Taizé Community, a place dear to Pope John Paul II’s heart, said that during the papal visit to Taizé on October 5, 1986, John Paul II proposed a path of ‚communion’ to the community. The Pope said: ‚You will help all those you meet to be faithful to their denominational ties, the fruits of their education and their conscience…’ In this way, John Paul II encouraged Protestants to remain faithful to false confessions of faith solemnly condemned by the Council of Trent. There is no mention of the need to convert to the one true Church of Christ for salvation.
The day after Pope John Paul II’s death, Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League issued a press release praising the late Pope for his relations with the Jewish people. Foxman wrote of John Paul: ‚Most importantly, the Pope recognized the special relationship between Christianity and the Jewish people, while sharing an understanding of Judaism as a living heritage, the enduring validity of God’s covenant with the Jewish people.’
Foxman thus praised John Paul II for rejecting the truth contained in Scripture and the defined dogmas of the Catholic Church that the New Covenant superseded and rendered obsolete the old Judaic Covenant.
Pope John Paul II was a man who effectively told the world that everything had suddenly changed, that the Church’s ‚triumphalism’ was over, that people no longer needed to convert to the Catholic Church to save their souls. The eclipse of the infallible dogma ‚Outside the Church, there is no salvation’ is the hallmark of his pontificate. Unfortunately, this is not a sign of greatness but a collapse in the spirit of the age.”
This quote could serve as a conclusion, but I will try to prove its truth by citing a few facts.
According to JPII’s teachings, we Catholics worship the same God as Muslims and Jews! John Paul II said: „During meetings with Muslims, I have repeatedly said that your God and our God is one and the same God, and we are brothers and sisters in the faith of Abraham” (Rome, 1985). He repeated this in the un-Tridentine Catechism of the Catholic Church, based largely on Vatican II. This is a denial of Christ and the Holy Trinity, which are explicitly rejected in those religions.
Interreligious Meetings in Assisi
Karol Wojtyła initiated some of the greatest blasphemies in Church history. He broke the foundations of the Catholic faith not only with words but with actions, because already in his inaugural encyclical he claimed:
„True ecumenical activity means openness, drawing closer, readiness for dialogue, seeking the truth together in its full evangelical and Christian meaning.
In a different way and to a different extent, the same must be applied to activities aimed at rapprochement with representatives of other, non-Christian religions, expressed in dialogue, meetings, common prayer, and the discovery of those treasures of human personality which – as we well know – are not lacking among the followers of these religions.”
Yes, these are the words of John Paul II. He invites all Protestants, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, and pagans to joint rituals, openly contradicting the teaching of the Catholic Church.
What does the phrase „seeking the truth together” even mean if not an acknowledgment that Catholics do not know the truth and must seek it alongside other religions instead of teaching it? What does this have to do with the words „Repent and believe in the Gospel” – the Church’s primary mission? How is Christ, who died so that you might repent and have eternal life, treated here if not as an optional addition to faith?
Let us recall what the Holy Catholic Church teaches:
„For all the gods of the pagans are devils, but the Lord made the heavens.” (Ps 96:5)
„Do not turn to idols, nor make for yourselves molten gods. I am the Lord your God.” (Lev 19:4)
„I will destroy your high places and break your idols. You will fall among the ruins of your idols, and my soul will abhor you.” (Lev 26:30)
„You shall have no foreign gods before my eyes.” (Deut 5:7)
„Overthrow their altars and break their statues, burn their groves with fire, and smash their idols to pieces: destroy their names from those places.” (Deut 12:3)
Unfortunately, Karol Wojtyła did not seem to consider himself a Catholic, because he decided to break all these principles. In 1986, he organized the first meeting in Assisi and allowed a statue of Buddha to be placed on the Tabernacle. For a Catholic, this is a horrific sacrilege, but as we know, modernists, like Protestants, do not believe in the real presence of Christ.
As can be seen, God hates blasphemy, and in 1997 an earthquake struck the basilica where these terrible things took place.
The worst, however, was yet to come. John Paul II decided, like Judas with a kiss, to betray our Lord Jesus Christ. He did so on May 14, 1999. He received a delegation in the Vatican that included the Shiite imam of the Khadum Mosque, the Sunni chairman of the administrative council of the Iraqi Islamic Bank, and a representative of the Iraqi Ministry of Religion. The „Pope” received a copy of the Koran from the Muslim guests, and John Paul II kissed the Koran, a book that calls the belief that Jesus Christ is God and died on the cross for our salvation a great blasphemy and heresy. Of course, the guests did not kiss the Gospel and never will, because they believe in their god and do not betray him as Karol Wojtyła did by kissing satanic verses. He betrayed like Judas…
Here we conclude. This was meant to be a lengthy study with photographic documentation, but it’s a waste of time to prove something that has long been proven and is available for anyone who wishes to examine it. Of course, one can live in a world of illusions and lies, but that is the world of Satan, not God. Our Lord Jesus Christ said:
„And whoever does not receive you, as you go out from that city, shake off the dust from your feet as a testimony against them.” (Lk 9:5)
And that is exactly what we are doing. We must speak the truth and move on, because there is no point in debating those who reject facts in favor of their own imaginings. We listen to God first, not people, even if they call themselves popes.
Before healing, Jesus Christ always asked:
„Do you believe?”
Because one cannot open the eyes of those who do not believe!
In conclusion:
Do you remember this warning?:
„Beware diligently of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thorns or figs from thistles? So every good tree bears good fruit, and a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.” (Mt 7:15–19)
What are the fruits of the Second Vatican Council?
– Empty churches, sexual scandals, corruption, demoralization, etc., etc.
The fathers of this council closed themselves off to the action of the Holy Spirit and opened themselves to the spirit of Protestant and Masonic advisors.
Do you remember the assassination attempt on John Paul II?
Immediately afterward, it was announced that this fulfilled these words:
„The Holy Father, before reaching it, passed through a great city half in ruins and, half trembling, with faltering steps, afflicted with pain and suffering, went praying for the souls of the dead people whose bodies he encountered on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, kneeling at the foot of the great Cross, he was killed by a group of soldiers who struck him several times with bullets and arrows.”
But he was not killed! So why was this immediately proclaimed?
Perhaps to divert attention from the fact that this situation more closely resembled these words:
„And I saw one of its heads as if it had been mortally wounded, and its deadly wound was healed. And all the earth marveled at the beast. And they worshiped the dragon who gave authority to the beast, and they worshiped the beast, saying: Who is like the beast?” (Rev 13:3–9)
„All the paths of the Church lead to man” – these words of Karol Wojtyła confirm that they dethroned God and enthroned man. They turned their backs, sat on those thrones, and demand homage to man and all the idols of this world created by people with the help of Satan. This, more or less, is modernism – man decided he would not obey God but would „renew” the Church in his own way, following the beast.
Before our eyes, the world is being overtaken by communism (the errors of Russia). Even the USA. Everything the Blessed Virgin Mary said is coming to pass, and no amount of denying reality will help. No one fulfilled Her requests. John Paul II also did not consecrate Russia or reveal the Third Secret of Fatima. In short, he betrayed.
How can one criticize Francis while glorifying his predecessor? Bergoglio does and says the same as his predecessors, only more openly. John Paul II did not mention hell, punishment, or purgatory, while Francis, in addition to this, hardly ever mentions Jesus Christ, only occasionally referring to a usually vague „God.” A worthy successor to his master.
The full text with photographic documentation and all links was published on January 11, 2021, here:
https://niewolnikmaryi45735217.wordpress.com/2022/04/02/droga-zatracenia-jan-pawel-ii-2/
Arkadiusz Niewolski
Catholic during the Great Apostasy 
Leave a comment